White guy asks: why do you need to bring race into it?
Here’s a nice example of what this site’s about. Angry Black Woman was asked by a man - presumably white, since he didn’t say, and we all know what that means - why she feels the need to identify herself with race, in addition to “angry” and “woman”? He says,
I mean, I myself am an “angry guy”, but I don’t really feel the need to add race into it. So my question is, why is there a need to put race into the picture?
Wow, dude, the privilege is like right there and you don’t see it. ABW nails the problem: her race is making Angry White Guy uncomfortable. He wants her not to mention it for all the reasons she says.
“White” is not a race. It is a cultural (delusional) default. It’s everyone who’s something other than white who belongs to a race. White people have the privilege of being race-less. Angry White Guy feels no need to bring race into it because he doesn’t belong to a race. He simply belongs.
Say what? Colorblind, part II. « Feline Formal Shorts on 13 Apr 2007 at 9:18 am #
[...] It relies on the framework of white as the unmarked default. It only really works if you agree that the dominant cultural paradigm here is not a white one, and [...]
Color-Blindness « The Blog and the Bullet on 18 Apr 2007 at 11:47 am #
[...] It relies on the framework of white as the unmarked default. It only really works if you agree that the dominant cultural paradigm here is not a white one, and [...]